About Us | CESC & You | Just for You | Contact Us
Our Background | Cash Collection Centers | Corporate Policy | Consultancy | Power Saving & Safety Guidelines | Customer Care | Shareholders' Information | Balance Sheet | Profit & Loss | Shareholder's Meeting | Annual Reports 02-03 | Annual Reports 03-04 |
Fault Reporting Centers | District Offices | Generation | Environment Management | CESC News Flash | FAQ | Major Statistics| | CRES
Generation Home Process Stations Departments Facts Awards History Glossary Steam Table FAQ Contacts
CESC Limited : Generation Division

Generating Power Since 1899 ...

header.jpg (10840 bytes)

  

CESC : FUEL : COMBUSTION
COMBUSTION
CESC’s five Generating Stations can broadly be divided into three categories considering Capacity, Technology and Age

CATEGORY

STATION BOILER TYPE COOLING TYPE AGE
Category-I BBGS Pulverized Fuel fired Boiler , Reheat Type Closed cycle cooling water Around 3 Years
Category-II TGS Pulverized Fuel fired Boiler, Non Reheat Type Once through Cooling water Around 18 Years
SGS Pulverized Fuel fired Boiler, Non Reheat Type Once through Cooling water Around 10 Years
Category -III NCGS Chain Grate Stoker fired Boiler, Non Reheat Type Once through Cooling water Around 50 Years
MGS Chain Grate Stoker fired Boiler, Non Reheat Type Once through Cooling water Around 60 Years
CESC’s Pulverized Fuel fired Generating Stations have boilers, using different combustion technologies. Titagarh Generating Station‘s Steam Generators use Babcock’s combustion technology, “Front fired boiler” boiler. Southern Generating Station uses Combustion Engineering (CE) technology, “Corner fired Boiler” boiler and Budge Budge Generating Station uses a special type of combustion technology of Babcock in their “Down Shot Fired” type of boiler to burn low volatile coal. The older stations (Non PF) are designed for using high grade of coal suitable for Babcock supplied Chain grate stoker fired boilers. This is a result of the prevailing technology when the generating stations were conceived. The quality of coal received at the Generating Stations is frequently different from that for which the boiler is designed. The change of quality of coal has an effect on boiler efficiency as boiler losses are different not only at different load but also at different quality of coal it burns.

We get coal from many Collieries and difference in quality is wide. We have reasons to believe here that coal quality better than design may not necessarily be better for a boiler when optimization of all controllable parameters are considered comprehensively. But as the poor quality of coal & the part loading affects the stability of the boiler, the oil consumption also becomes high. The Change of coal quality also has effect on the coal mill performance as far as it’s output, loading, wear, quantity of mill rejects & pf fineness are concerned. Perspective environmental implications are also there.

The efficiency of  Turbo Alternator improves with load. This can be proved that heat required for a change of load is summation of (a “fixed heat”and incremental heat * load). For a contemporary designed machine this fixed heat is around 5-7% of full load heat consumption. Ideally the incremental heat is constant for any load change. So at low load unit runs at higher heat consumption. CESC’s all the power stations are subjected to this feature because of the very typical daily load curve of CESC area. These phenomena aggravate the situation further in winter season. So running the units at higher load to achieve higher thermal efficiency is not always possible at CESC’s Generating Stations. This is a constraint to which CESC does not have any control. At part load, although the works power reduces, the percentage works power rises. Due to support for ignition as well as cut in /cut out of coal mills to accommodate load cycling and two shifting, the oil consumption also goes high increasing the heat rate of the station and for the Stoker fired Boilers ‘banking Loss’ increases.

Last updated on 17.04.02